“Education via Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Model”- A Candle In Dark Pakistan’s Academia”
Pakistan is facing a serious challenge to ensure all the children, particularly the most disadvantaged and impoverished to attend, stay and learn in school. The Covid-19 pandemic has already proven that Pakistan has an inadequate public education system that fulfills demand-supply equilibrium, as the access to quality and equitable education remains very low. Currently, Pakistan has the world’s second-highest number of out-of-school children (OOSC) with an estimated 22.8 million children aged 5-16 not attending school, representing 44 percent of the total population in this age group. In the 5-9 age group, 5 million children are not enrolled in schools. After primary-school age, the number of OOSC doubles, with 11.4 million adolescents between the ages of 10 and 14 not receiving formal education.
Disparities based on gender, socio-economic status,
and geography are significant. In Sindh, 52 percent of
the poorest children (58 percent girls) are out of school, and in Balochistan,
78 percent of girls are out of school. Nearly 10.7 million boys and 8.6
million girls are enrolled at the primary level and this drops to 3.6 million
boys and 2.8 million girls at the lower secondary level. Gender-wise,
boys outnumber girls at every stage of education. Poverty and parental attitudes to girls’ education in distant
areas are the leading causes of girls
not attending school. Rag-picker children are also deprived of this blessing of
education.
Socio-cultural demand-side barriers combined with
economic factors and supply-related issues (such as availability of school facilities),
together hamper the access and retention of certain marginalized groups. Schools’
infrastructure in remote areas of Pakistan is much poor, as girls’ schools lack basic facilities such
as toilets, water, or electricity.
Gaps in service provision at all educational levels are
the major constraints to education access. The
government education sector is incapable to provide holistic education and
enroll all the children of Pakistan at the same time. On the other hand, the Private
sector is affordable and in a range of just a few limited people of the country.
Governance challenges and poor teaching quality make education delivery
even more complex.
What is Public-Private Partnership
(PPP) Model?
Public-Private Partnership (PPP) is
defined as “a long-term contract between a private party and a government
entity, for providing a public asset or service, in which the private party
bears significant risk and management responsibility, and remuneration is
linked to performance” (The World Bank, 2019). The roots of
PPP can be traced back to Leibenstein (1966) who introduced the concept of
“X-efficiency”, explained the productivity differences between public and
private firms with intangible “X-factors” such as labor-management relations,
organizational structures, incentive systems, and selection of workers. In line
with Leibenstein's (1966) suggestions, PPP can be
necessary for governments and public firms to reduce the inefficiencies which
occur in their organizational structures. “Indeed, PPPs may both increase the
amount of capital for infrastructure investments and the efficiency of any
operation through the transfer of private sector expertise” (Ahwireng-Obeng
& Mokgohlwa, 2002; Bajwa et al., 2018). While there are various
potential benefits of PPP in several areas of economic and social life. Such an
alternative source of funding, the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model has
become increasingly popular in recent decades as a mechanism to support
infrastructure or other related investment activities of low-income and
developing countries.
Reasons Behind Acquisition Of “PPP”
Model In Developing Countries
Budgetary constraints, high levels of the national
debt, and lack of sufficient funds are often identified as reasons why low-income
and developing countries seek to find an alternative method to finance their
infrastructure or to make better their socio-economic life. Also, Macroeconomic
stability is often cited as a significant factor in implementing PPP projects.
Macro-economic stability in terms of PPP projects means the relationship between
macroeconomic variables (i.e. GDP,
per capita income, general government balance, total debt, inflation, money supply),
PPP activity by using World Development
Indicators (WDI), and The Private Participation in Infrastructure (PPI).
The PPP model is reported as beneficial for the whole economy as well as for both
public and private parties. Several studies find that “PPP” provides several
advantages and opportunities in terms of fiscal stabilization, fund flows, and
efficiency gain to the developing countries due to a long-term partnership
between public and private actors with the aim of mutual benefits. Countries with large budget deficits were
more likely to use PPP whereas countries with natural resource endowment were
less likely to use PPP.
PPP Model With Respect To Developing
Pakistan
The decision for
governments and private firms to engage in a PPP project may be very
challenging in developing countries (Kamasak, Yavuz, and James, 2019), as in
any business model, the satisfaction of both parties, in particular the private
partner, and the effectiveness of the project remain aspirational and may not
be guaranteed unless a careful evaluation is conducted about the potential
factors that may affect PPP success. By taking into account the complex
dynamics of developing countries like Pakistan, it is imperative that private
firms and governments which target potential PPP projects should have a
thorough understanding of the relationship between economic factors and PPP
arrangements. This is not only important for the efficiency of PPPs but also
for the mutual benefit of the partners. Without
a well-organized PPP system that also considers good timing, the probability of
failure might be higher than the probability of success.
How could Pakistan Benefit From PPP Model In Education?
The education
sector in Pakistan has been a hub for educational experiments with new products
being launched from time to time. Instead of waiting for the ‘next big thing’,
it might be worthwhile to learn lessons from and adapt what has worked in
similar fragile contexts. PPPs offer the
flexibility to incorporate community-supported education programs and have the
capability to match the scale of the public sector. The model has the potential
to offer responsive and cost-effective learning for students, especially for
girls and rag-picker children. While public-private partnership (PPP)
initiatives have the potential to increase the supply of schools, more effort
is needed to increase demand.
How Can Public-Private Partnerships In Education Sector Of Pakistan Help?
Public-private partnerships, in which the state works
with private, often non-profit organizations to build and manage schools,
may alleviate the supply-side challenges by improving teaching quality,
and increasing access to learning. Evaluations of PPP models from developing
countries and their impact suggests that such programs led to increases in enrolment and
improvements in school infrastructure. However, a PPP initiative may require
more than simply constructing and managing a school. To create a demand for
education and increase enrollment in such a context, it is especially important
to work closely with community leaders who can influence parental attitudes.
Our neighboring countries such as India, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan successfully increased both the access to education and the quality
provided by using community-based initiatives to deliver local educational
services to cover the case of rag-picker children.
Small-scale community-based schooling models implemented in the socially conservative districts of Pakistan, led to an increase in enrollment, especially for girls, by
75% and 51% respectively.
How does Education With PPP In Pakistan Works?
PPP models and their adaptability to address gendered
barriers provide us with various important lessons for improving the education
system in Pakistan:
·
Mobilization of P3A (Public Private
Partnership Authority), Government of Pakistan towards educational projects
is the dire need of time for better availability of education for all in
Pakistan.
·
Engage with the community, religious, and
political leaders through Parent-Teacher
Councils (PTCs) and Jirgas (a
traditional assembly of tribal leaders) that can specifically address barriers
hindering girls’ enrolment. Community-based schools in Balochistan employing such an approach
tripled their enrolment of girls in junior secondary schools.
·
Hire school staff from the local community, especially female teachers at the primary level, as
local female teachers are relatively more trusted by the communities than
outsiders.
·
Build girls’ schools (even if smaller) that are located closer to the
communities to reduce transport issues for girls. In a study of school life in Ghana, schools were set up with
support from communities by PPP Model, and within five years this
model had spread to 767 communities with 36,000 pupils, 43% of which were
girls.
Remarks
“As both man or girl, without
education is like………………………….a building without foundation, a bird without
wings, or a genius like silver in the mine”.
So it is a dire need of time to pay more attention on the implementation
of the PPP Model in the education sector of Pakistan for the creation of a
better, skilled, and wise Youth, which consequently is the only solution
for the holistic social and economic well-being of Pakistan.
References:
2. 2. https://www.dawn.com/news/1643082
3. 3. https://www.dawn.com/news/1597881
4. 4. https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/776203-an-unfinished-end
5. 5. https://www.opml.co.uk/blog/public-private-partnerships-future-girls-education-pakistan
6. 6. https://www.unicef.org/pakistan/education
7. 7. https://www.dawn.com/news/1623032
8. 8. https://www.dawn.com/news/1587747
Written By:
Abdul Moeed Awan.
BS - PAG.
6th Semester.
Morning Shift.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well articulated... everything is so on point
ReplyDeleteThank you so much Ayesha
Deleteexcellent... keep it up ❤
ReplyDeleteThank you so much hassan
DeleteNot all projects are possible (for various reasons: political, legal, commercial viability, etc.). The private sector may not be interested in a project due to perceived high risks, or it may lack the capacity to implement the project. What you say on this statement
ReplyDeleteYes malik zee waqar you are absolutely saying right. All the above mentioned reasons you highlighted have implications on private sector. But yes you are saying about capacity of private sector, it got increased when private sector make partnerships with public entities in differentprojects. On the other hand matters regarding the risk factor got decreased when both entities private-public mutually share their ideas to solve the problems and move forward.
ReplyDeleteMoeed, up till now I haven't read such a valid writing price of information. You've written your opinion and the facts too so well. I really appreciate your efforts.
ReplyDeleteThank you sooo much Gulrukh, your words means alot for me 😇
ReplyDelete